Abstract: How do local communities define peace in the everyday, and are those ways of knowing peace identifiable beyond community-level interactions? Despite the local turn’s motivation for grounded knowledge, the scholarship still faces methodological challenges rooted in questions about who, what, and where constitutes the “local”. This article examines whether locally identified understandings of peace remain meaningful beyond the communities in which they are articulated. Drawing on 70 interviews from Southwest and Southeast Nigeria, I combine structural topic modeling (STM) and thematic analysis to examine whether and how everyday peace indicators travel across communities to the Local Government Area level and across culturally distinct contexts experiencing the same conflict type. This methodological approach departs from the focus group-based elicitation commonly used in Everyday Peace Indicators research, allowing me to identify and compare patterns within and across communities at scale where ongoing violence made group-based data collection less feasible. I find that several indicators travel across culturally distinct regions, particularly those concerning mobility, participation in festivals, children playing together, the ability to remain at farms later in the day, and whether people speak freely with neighbors or in hushed tones. Religious participation and vehicle monitoring, however, remain context-dependent indicators. Religious participation, particularly whether religious services and peacebuilding efforts are multi-religious, differs between the Southwest and Southeast in ways that reflect their different demographic compositions. These findings demonstrate that “local” need not necessarily mean village- or community-specific within the same conflict type. Instead, the scalability of everyday peace indicators varies across domains, suggesting that locally grounded measures can travel across communities while remaining sensitive to social and demographic variation that conditions their meaning.